Zambry must clarify the position of the 14,000 hec of land approved to Rahman Hydraulic Tin Bhd as announced by Dato’ Hamidah Osman, his Senior Exco i

Media Statement by Senior Exco Pakatan Rakyat Perak State Government, MP for Beruas YB Dato’ Ngeh Koo Ham at Pusat Khidmat DAP DUN Sitiwan, Sitiawan on Friday, 28th August 2009:

On 7/8/2009, Dato’ Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir accused me (Ngeh Koo Ham), YB Nga Kor Ming (MP for Taiping and PR Perak State Government Exco member) and YAB Datuk Seri Mohd Nizar Bin Jamaluddin (PR Perak Menteri Besar ) of spreading lies and accusing the BN State Government of approving 14,000 hec of land to Rahman Hydraulic Tin Bhd for Tin prospecting. The same was in fact announced by Dato’ Hamidah Osman, Zambry’s State Government Senior Exco member in April this year to be media. Zambry should clarify whether he is lying or Hamidah Osman is lying and both of them have a duty to the public to clarify the actual situation with regard to the approval of the said 14,000 hec of land.

Since my media statement on 12/8/2009 on this issue, Dato’ Seri Zambry has been exceptionally quiet on this matter. We at Pakatan Rakyat and the people of Perak demand from him transparency and he should clear the air on this issue immediately or we can presume that another scandal is brewing and will cause huge damage to the State of Perak and her people unless it is stopped now.

Dato’ Ngeh Koo Ham

-------------------------------------

民联霹雳州高级行政议员兼木威区国会议员拿督倪可汉于2009年8月28日，于实兆远民主行动党州议员服务中心发表文告：

针对国阵高级行政议员拿督哈米达今年四月宣布批准1万4000公顷土地给Rahman HydraulicTin 公司，赞比里必须对此事的真正情况作出解释。

在2009年8月7日，拿督斯里赞比里控诉我（倪可汉）、倪可敏（太平区国会议员、民联霹雳州行政议员）及拿督斯里莫哈末尼查（民联霹雳州务大臣）散布谎言，指责国阵州政府批准了1万4000公顷的土地给Rahman Hydraulic Tin 公司，以进行锡米的采矿探测。然而事实上，在今年4月份，赞比里政府的高级行政议员拿督哈米达就在媒体宣布国阵政府批准了上述土地。

赞比里必须解释，究竟是他还是哈米达在撒谎？他们有责任向公众交代事情的真正情况。

自从我在2009年8月12日针对此事发表文告以来，拿督斯里赞比里却意外地保持沉默，回避这个问题。我们代表民联及所有霹雳州人民，向他提出透明施政的要求，他必须马上作出清楚的交代。如不然，我们可以假设有更多的丑闻正在酝酿，并且会对霹雳州及霹雳州人民造成更大的破坏。

Ceramah "Siapakah Speaker Perak Yang Sah"

Tarikh: 31/08/2009, Masa : 7:30pm , Tempat: Hotel Excelsior,Ipoh Tingkat 14

霹雳州民主行动党即将在国庆日（星期一）当晚举办一场“谁是霹雳州合法议长”讲座会。地点是怡保怡东酒店14楼，时间晚上7点半，入场免费。

霹雳州行动党宣传局发文告表示下一场902州议会即将来临，所以这场讲座会可说为人民对902开始前的认识活动。也让民众知道谁才是真正的合法议长。

当晚主讲者是原任行政议员拿督倪可汉，议长西华古马，陈国强律师和梁卓经律师。当晚讲座会以双语出发，同时欢迎各界出席。

Media Statement by YB Dato’ Ngeh Koo Ham in Ipoh on 26th August 2009:

The Malaysian Bar Council Press Release confirms that Dato’ R. Ganesan was dishonest with regard to the time he ceased practice as a lawyer. Dato’ R. ganesan wrote to Bar Council only after V. Sivakumar’s lawyer notified him that even if he had been duly elected as Speaker (which he was not) he would also have been disqualified.

The Malaysian Bar Council Press Release confirms that Dato’ R. Ganesan has been dishonest when he said he ceased legal practice on 6/8/2009. It was obvious that he had fraudulently back dated his letter to the Bar Council.

The Bar Council had issued a letter to V. Sivakumar’s lawyer, Mr Chan Kok Keong informing him that Dato’ R. Ganesan was still in active practice as on 11/8/2009.

On 12/8/2009, Mr Chan Kok Keong served an affidavit containing the said confirmation on Dato’ R. Ganesan’s solicitors.

The Bar Council confirm that it was only on 13/8/2009, that they received a fax from Dato’ R. Ganesan a letter dated 6/8/2009 informing them that he has ceased practice as from 6/8/2009. It was obvious that Dato’ R. Ganesan had back dated his letter.

Only on 17/8/2009 that the Bar Council acknowledged receipt of Dato’ Ganesan’s back dated letter dated 6/8/2009 and his Notice of Cessation and Statutory Declaration dated 17/8/2009.

The spirit of Article XXX VIA (5) of the Perak Constitution is that the Speaker must cease his existing business or profession immediately and in any case not more than 3 months after his appointment as Speaker failing which he shall be disqualified.

While we never at any time recognize Dato’ R. Ganesan as lawfully elected, even if going by BN’s contention that he was lawfully elected (which he was not) he was disqualified as from 7/8/2009. Dato’ R. Ganesan cannot revive his Speaker post after disqualification by back dating his letter.

What is most disappointing is that we see dishonesty everywhere in BN. From Permatang Pasir candidate, Rohaizat Othman to the court appointed Perak Menteri Besar Dato’ Seri Zambry Bin Abdul Kadir and now to Dato’ R. Ganesan, they have been less than honest in their dealings and actions.

DATO’ NGEH KOO HAM

- Member of Parliament for Beruas

- Senior Exco Pakatan Rakyat Perak State Government

-------------------------

民联高级行政议员兼民主行动党霹雳州主席拿督倪可汉于2009年8月26日，在怡保发表文告：

马来西亚律师公会发表的文告证实拿督甘尼申在何时终止律师职务一事的正确时间上不诚实，拿督甘尼申是在西华古玛揭发他之后才写信给律师公会。即使他是被合法地选为议长（其实他并没有），他也已经丧失了议长资格。

马来西亚律师公会的文告确认拿督甘尼申说他在2009年8月6日终止律师职务的说法是不诚实，这很明显地显示他在写给律师公会的信函，日期已经回溯了较早的时候。

律师公会发给西华古玛的律师陈国强的信件中指明拿督甘尼申直至2009年8月11日仍然是一名活跃的执业律师。

在2009年8月12日，陈国强律师提交宣誓书证实拿督甘尼申是一名执业律师。

律师公会已经证实在2009年8月13日，他们才收到由拿督甘尼申传真的一封志期2009年8月6日的信件，通知律师公会他已经在2009年8月6日开始终止他本人的律师职务。这已经很明显地显示拿督甘尼申已经将他发给律师公会的信件日期回溯至较早的时候。

律师公会在2009年8月17日才公认正式收到拿督甘尼申志期2009年8月6日的信函，同时他的终止通知法定声明日期是在2009年8月17日。

霹雳州宪法第XXX VIA（5）条文是指议长在被选出后必须马上终止他原有的生意事业或职业，并且在任何情况下都不能超过3个月限期，若议长没有这么做，他将丧失议长资格。

我们从来没有承认拿督甘尼申是被合法选出的议长，即使国阵声明他是被合法选出（其实他并没有），他也将从2009年8月7日开始丧失议长资格。拿督甘尼申不能因为将他的信件日期回溯至较早时候就希望能恢复其议长资格。

最让我们感到失望的是，我们发现国阵充满了不诚实的行为。从峇东巴西补选候选人罗海扎失信被吊销律师执照，到法庭指拿督斯里赞比里是霹雳州务大臣，以及现在拿督甘尼申回溯信件日期，他们的种种行为都缺乏诚信。

Media Statement by DAP Chairman of Perak, MP for Beruas and Senior Exco Pakat Rakyat Perak Dato Ngeh Koo Ham at Headquarter Perak, Ipoh

Perak State is in a stand still mode and the people suffer as a result. Call on the people to boycott Zambry and his exco for refusing to bow to the wishes of the people that the Perak State Legislative Assembly be dissolved and a fresh election called to resolve the present predicament


More than 6 months have elapsed since the immoral and unprincipled grab of power in Perak by Dato’ Seri Zambry Bin Abdul Kadir and his Exco members. The people of Perak is suffering as no serious investor would want to have a look at Perak due to the uncertainties created by Dato’ Seri Zambry and his BN power grabbers. Recent announcements that some investors are interested to invest in Perak are only eyewash to mislead the people. None of the projects is moving and investors remain at the interested to invest stage.The position of the Menteri Besar is still in doubt waiting for the final arbiter, the Federal Court to make a decision. Entangled together with the question as to who the legitimate Menteri Besar is, is the uncertainty of the local councilors and the village heads appointed by BN to replace the councilors and village heads appointed or elected under the Pakatan Rakyat Government. We hardly see anything moves in Perak as a result. BN is solely responsible for this state of affairs.

During the 10 months’ reign of Perak by Pakatan Rakyat under the able leadership of Dato Seri Nizar Bin Jamaluddin, people see positive changes sweeping through Perak which benefited them. During the short 10 months, scores of positive changes were made which benefited the people.

The people must end this present predicament and the way forward is to dissolve the State Legislative Assembly and allow a fresh election to be held. 90% of those surveyed (which includes both BN and PR supporters) wanted the State Legislative Assembly dissolved. We cannot allow Dato’ Seri Zambry Bin Abd Kadir to go against the wishes of the people. I call on the people to boycott Zambry and his exco members. All organizations and associations must stop inviting them to their functions to send a clear and strong message that we will not accept Zambry’s refusal to dissolve the State Legislative Assembly. Zambry from UMNO with his racist’s mind has said that I have called on the Chinese Associations not to invite him to their functions which is a lie. He tries again to play the racial card which is in vogue with UMNO leaders. My call is to all organizations and associations and to people of all races and religions to boycott him and his Exco members. The desire to see the Perak State Legislative Assembly dissolved to pave the way for a fresh election comes from people of all races and religions as the people is demanding back their democratic rights to chose their leaders to lead the state of Perak.


民主行动党霹雳州主席、木威区国会议员兼民联霹雳州高级行政议员拿督倪可汉于2009年8月20日，在怡保霹雳州总部发表文告：

霹雳州依然处在一个人民受损害的现况。呼吁人民杯葛赞比里及他的行政议员因其拒绝依附人民的意愿解散霹雳州议会重新选举，以便解决目前的窘境。


民联霹雳州政权被拿督斯里赞比里及其行政议员不道德及毫无原则地夺走至今已经超过6个月。霹雳州人民处在受损害的情况，因为拿督斯里赞比里及国阵的夺权者导致的不确定性，造成没有真诚的投资者愿意前来霹雳州进行投资。

最新的宣布指出，有一些投资者有兴趣在霹雳州进行投资只是为了误导人民的表面说辞，事实上并没有任何工程已经开始进行，投资者依然停留在观望的阶段。

州务大臣的地位依然未确定，仍然等待联邦法院仲裁作出最后的判决。在未知谁是真正合法的州务大臣的同时，国阵委任市议员及村长取代民联委任及选出的市议员及村长的做法也出现争议性。我们几乎看不见霹雳州有任何的改进。国阵是唯一必须为这些情况负责。

拿督斯里尼查领导的民联政府在执政的10个月内，让人民看见及感受到霹雳州许多正面及对人民有益的改变。在短短的10个月，有许多积极的政策改变真正惠及人民。

人民必须终止目前的困境，最好的方法就是解散州议会重新选举。根据民调，共有90%的人民（包括国阵及民联的支持者）要求解散州议会。我们不能允许拿督斯里赞比里违背人民的意愿。

我呼吁人民杯葛赞比里及他的行政议员。所有组织及社团一定要停止邀请他们出席本身举办的活动，以便传达一个强烈及清楚的讯息，即我们不会接受赞比里表示拒绝解散州议会的做法。来自巫统并拥有种族歧视的思维的赞比里曾说过我呼吁华人社团不邀请他们出席活动的说法是谎言。他再次使用巫统领袖惯用的种族伎俩。我的呼吁是面向所有的组织、社团及人民，包括所有种族及宗教，全面杯葛赞比里及他的行政议员。

希望霹雳州议会解散并重新进行选举是来自各民族及宗教的人民心里最大的意愿，因为他们希望能重新取回民主的权利，选出他们心目中的领袖来领导霹雳州。

Media Statement By Dato'Ngeh Koo Ham At DAP Perak On 18th Aug 2009

Perak State Assembly sitting on 2/9/2009 is valid and legal. Zambry must respect rule of law



I refer to the Perak State Assembly sitting called by Speaker YB V. Sivakumar to be held on 2^nd September 2009. Dato’ Seri Zambry Bin Abd Kadir’s comment that the Speaker will probably hold it under a tree again indicates that Dato’ Seri Zambry will be blocking the usage of the Perak Legislative Assembly Hall for the said sitting.This shows Dato’ Seri Zambry’s utter contempt for the Perak State Legislative Assembly and the democratic system in this country. I hope Dato’ Seri Dr. Zambry Abd. Kadir will respect the rule of law. Though not elected by the people of Perak, we tentatively respect Zambry as the Menteri Besar of Perak as declared by the Court of Appeal, he should also respect YB V. Sivakumar as the legitimate Speaker of the Perak State Legislative Assembly.

At all material times, both BN and the PR parties respected YB V. Sivakumar as the Speaker of the State Assembly at the last sitting of the Assembly on 7/5/2009.

The 7/5/2009 sitting had not commenced until the Regent of Perak gave his opening speech. The purported election of Dato’ R. Ganesan as the Assembly’s Speaker by a small group of BN elected representatives (which was not legal in itself) was done prior to the opening of the State Assembly by the Regent of Perak. How can a decision made prior to the commencement of a meeting be valid? By insisting that the election of Dato’ R. Ganesan was lawful, Dato’ Seri Dr. Zambry Abd Kadir is denying the role played by his Royal Highness the Sultan of Perak or the Regent with regard to the opening of a State Assembly sitting. He should apologize to the palace for taking such a stand.

As YB V. Sivakumar is still the legitimate Speaker of the Perak Assembly, he is the only person entitled to call for the sitting of the coming assembly and Dato’ Seri Zambry Abd Kadir who heads the Executive must direct the State Secretary to respect the separation of powers in our democratic system. He must accord respect and cooperation and allow elected representatives to attend the sessions fixed on 2/9/2009.

Dato’ Seri Zambry must make clear his stand otherwise the elected representatives of Perak will deem that any blockage to the State Assembly on 2/9/2009 will be deemed to be on his instructions.

Dated this 18^th August 2009.

DATO’ NGEH KOO HAM

民主行动党霹雳州主席拿督倪可汉于2009年8月18日在怡保霹雳州总部发表文告：

于2009年9月2日召开的霹雳州议会将是有效及合法的，赞比里必须尊重法律

我经已查阅霹雳州议长西华古玛将于2009年9月2日召开霹雳州议会。拿督斯里赞比里的言论指议长或将再次在树下召开议会，如此恰好证明了拿督斯里赞比里将封锁霹雳州议会厅以召开上述议会。

这显示了拿督斯里赞比里彻底蔑视霹雳州议会以及这个国家的民主制度。我希望拿督斯里赞比里尊重法律。虽然他并非霹雳州人民所选择，然而我们依然尊重上诉庭判决赞比里作为霹雳州务大臣。因此他也应该尊重西华古玛为霹雳州议会合法的议长。

在所有重要时刻，包括国阵及民联都尊重西华古玛在最近一次即2009年5月7日召开的州议会上，他仍然是议长的身份。

2009年5月7日召开的州议会，直至霹雳州摄政王发表开幕御词前都未真正开始进行。当时由一群国阵议员选出拿督加尼森为议长（并不合法），在摄政王还未宣布议会开幕前进行。一个会议开始前作出的决定如何能够被视为有效？

拿督斯里赞比里坚持认为拿督加尼森被选为议长是合法的决定，那么他已经拒绝了霹雳州苏丹殿下或摄政王关于宣布州议会开幕所扮演的角色。赞比里必须为他的坚持向皇宫作出道歉。

当西华古玛还是霹雳州唯一合法的议长，只有他有权力召开州议会，而拿督斯里赞比里领导的行政权利必须指示州秘书尊重我国三权分立的民主制度。他必须给予尊重及合作，并且允许议员们出席定于2009年9月2 日的州议会。

拿督斯里赞比里必须做出一个清楚的立场，否则霹雳州的议员将会认为若在2009年9月2日召开的州议会发生任何阻挡及封锁，这都是来自赞比里的指示。

民主行动党霹雳州宣传秘书兼桂和区州议员黄家和律师于2009年8月13日（星期四）在怡保所发表的声明：

民主行动党霹雳州宣传秘书黄家和律师表示，反贪污委员会应该针对巴生港口自贸区主要承包商Kuala Dimensi总执行长张庆信声称曾经在马华现任总会长拿督斯里翁诗杰的要求下给于马华1000万令吉捐款的事件做出调查，以让真相水落石出。

也是民主行动党桂和区州议员的黄家和表示对于张庆信的揭露深表震惊，而翁诗杰在否认指责的同时也有必要给于他与张庆信、以及Kuala Dimensi之间的关系作出完整的交代，理清当中所引发的疑问。

“如果翁诗杰否认马华曾经接受过张庆信1000令吉的捐献、而张庆信却坚持拥有证人见证整个现钱捐款过程，最近在调查雪兰莪民联政府拨款显得异常有效率的反贪污委员会应该自行介入调查，让人民知道究竟谁在散慌、并对付任何涉及不当行径的人士。”

另一方面，黄氏也对总警长拿督斯里慕沙哈山表示将引用煽动法令调查社青团总团长陆兆福深表不满。黄氏说，陆兆福已经向警察报案表示否认曾经发表过侮辱霹雳州王储的言论，但是慕沙哈山却坚持调查陆兆福，再度显示出他是作为国阵打击民联的工具。